Hydrogen has emerged as a promising resource in renewable energy, capable of decarbonising sectors from steelmaking to long-haul transport. Its key attraction is that, when used in fuel cells or combusted, the only direct emission is water vapour. However, not all hydrogen is created equal. Production methods—and the energy that powers them—determine both the fuel’s true carbon footprint and its commercial competitiveness.

To reflect those differences, the industry assigns each production route a colour. This “hydrogen colour palette” is more than technical jargon: it guides policy incentives, shapes corporate procurement decisions and signals long-term infrastructure needs

Hydrogen production pathways and their key attributes

ColourPrimary feedstock / processTypical CO₂ intensity* (kg CO₂ ∕ kg H₂)Current cost range (USD ∕ kg, 2025)Commercial maturityNotes on by-products or infrastructure
Black / BrownCoal or lignite gasification (water–gas shift)18 – 201.2 – 2.2Established in China, South AfricaGenerates large volumes of CO₂ and solid ash; requires gas-clean-up before use
GreySteam-methane reforming (SMR) of natural gas9 – 121.0 – 2.0Global workhorse (≈ 70 % of supply)Lowest capex but no CO₂ capture; depends on gas price and methane-leak control
BlueSMR or autothermal reforming + carbon capture and storage (CCS)4 – 6 (assuming ≥ 90 % capture)1.5 – 3.0Early commercial; projects in Alberta, Texas, UKEffectiveness hinges on sustained high capture rates and long-term CO₂ storage liability
TurquoiseMethane pyrolysis (thermal cracking)< 1 if heated with zero-carbon power2.0 – 4.0 (pilot-scale estimates)Pilot plants in EU / USProduces solid carbon (graphite or carbon black) that can be sold, eliminating CO₂ handling
Pink / Red / PurpleLow-temperature electrolysis powered by nuclear electricity (often with steam extraction)< 12.0 – 4.0Demonstration: France, Canada, USProvides 24 ⁄ 7 baseload H₂; economics tied to nuclear plant operating costs
YellowElectrolysis powered exclusively by onsite solar PV< 13.5 – 6.0 (depends on solar yield and utilisation)Commercial in sunny regionsOutput fluctuates with irradiance; usually paired with battery or H₂ storage for steady supply
GreenElectrolysis using a mix of renewables (wind, solar, hydro)< 13.0 – 6.0 today; sub-3 projected by 2030 in high-resource areasRapidly scaling; > 600 announced projectsZero direct emissions; competitiveness improves with cheap renewable power and 45V / RFNBO incentives
White (natural)Geologic hydrogen vented from subsurface reservoirsData limited; likely lowTo be determinedExploration phase (US, Mali, France)Could bypass energy-intensive production, but volumes and extraction economics remain uncertain

WHY THE PALETTE MATTERS

Global hydrogen output already sits near 70 million tonnes a year, most of it grey, and that single industry emits roughly 830 million tonnes of CO₂—more than Germany produces annually. Moving even a slice of this volume up the colour spectrum therefore has outsized climate impact. Engineering firm Worley counts more than 600 low-carbon hydrogen projects on its books, evidence that scale and cost hurdles are beginning to fall.

Cost gaps are narrowing thanks to technology breakthroughs. Norwegian researchers recently shaved membrane thickness by one-third and cut platinum content by 62 percent in fuel-cell stacks, lowering stack costs by about 20 percent. Advances like this make green or pink hydrogen more competitive downstream, where fuel cells turn the gas back into electricity.

COLOURS IN MOTION

Rail: Siemens is building three two-car Mireo Plus H regional trains for Bavaria. Each set will travel up to 1 200 kilometres on green hydrogen and enter service in 2026.
Infrastructure: Deutsche Bahn and UK electrolyser maker ITM Power plan to seed green-hydrogen depots across Germany so rail fleets fill up with the cleanest fuel.
Road: China’s FAW Hongqi has passed stringent tests on its latest fuel-cell sedan, cutting hydrogen consumption about 15 percent below rival models.

Colour labels offer a convenient shorthand for hydrogen’s carbon intensity, but policymakers and investors now prioritise precise lifecycle metrics—specifically, grams of CO₂ per kilogram of hydrogen. Production pathways that achieve the lowest emissions at commercial scale—whether blue as a transition option, turquoise with marketable solid-carbon by-products, or green via renewable electrolysis—are expected to secure the largest share of future investment and deployment.

ibadather100@gmail.com'

By Ibad Ather

Ibad holds a Master’s in Policy & Management from Vanderbilt University. As a Market Research and Policy Analyst, he specializes in the nexus between finance, energy, and public policy. His work focuses on the role of policymaking in scaling smart energy solutions and fostering leadership in science and technology.